Thursday 26 June 2014

The tact of teaching of devising

Jane Hartley

This research takes the form of a critical reflection (Larivee, 2000) on aspects of teaching a second year module entitled ‘MX2001: devising 1’ within the BA (Hons) in Music Theatre, at UCLan, wherein students are tasked to work in groups to co-create (or devise) original pieces of ‘new music theatre’.


Critical reflection infers a social constructivist/critical ideological ontology: that there is no knowable reality beyond our meaning constructions of it mediated by power relations (Mcilveen, 2008; Poneterotto, 2005). Critical reflection on pedagogy, then, prompts us to move beyond discourses of effectiveness of teaching in order to uncover and assess the assumptions, and ethics, driving practice and the relationships of these to power (Larivee, 2000; Van Manen, 1991). 

The first session of MX2001 focused on exploring the meaning of the term ‘new music theatre’.  In support of this I used Socratic questioning and small group discussion in vertical grouping with third years (who had already completed the module) and in preference to a lecture. On reflection I realised I had assessed the students’ desires as at variance with the challenges and content of the module and had used constructivist learning approaches to locate the subject of study within the students and their trusted relationships with third years. In so doing I was seeking to motivate students and to mediate the perceived distance between them and the module.

Van Manen (1991) conceptualises this mediation process as an act of pedagogical tact that flows from a parental disposition towards students (ibid p.7). Thus I have found I exercise a parenting disposition within andragogy: that I assume a certain type of inequality between the students (that I know what is best for them) and exercise a hidden and specific type of authority (that of influence). Moreover, within this I call students to exercise the virtue of responsibility.

There are concerns arising, for me, around whether a parenting disposition within andragogy is appropriate. However, formal and informal, mid-point evaluations of the module indicate high levels of student satisfaction and achievement. I tentatively conclude that, in this instance, my academic parenting may have been axiomatic to students’ academic maturing rather than contradictory to it. This seems somewhat counterintuitive.
 
References

Larrivee, B. (2000) ‘Transforming teaching practice: becoming a critically reflective teacher’, Reflective Practice, vol. 1 no. 3, pp. 294-307.

Mcilveen, P. (2008) ‘Autoethnography as a method for reflective research and practice in vocational psychology’ in Australian Journal of career development, vol. 17. no. 2, pp. 13-20

Ponterotto, J.G. (2005) ‘Qualitative research in counselling psychology: a primer on research paradigms and philosophy of science in Journal of counselling psychology, vol. 52 no. 2, pp. 126-136.

Van Manen, M. (1991) The tact of teaching: the meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany: State University of New York Press